Skip to Content

Welcome!

Share and discuss the best content and new marketing ideas, build your professional profile and become a better marketer together.

Sign up

This question has been flagged
3 Replies
957 Views

MLO advertising lives and dies on four disclosures. Get these right and your posts ship same-day. Miss one and NEXA (or your state regulator) will yank it. Here is my template for every rate-mention social post.

1. Licensing identity. Every post includes my name, NMLS ID, the NEXA company NMLS, and states I am licensed in. Not in the bio — in the post itself or the creative. Bio-only identity does not satisfy SAFE Act or most state rules.

2. Trigger terms = triggering disclosures. Under Reg Z §1026.24, if you mention a specific rate, APR, down payment, loan term, or payment amount, you MUST include the full trigger-term disclosures: APR, terms of repayment, and any applicable fees. "3.99% rate!" without APR and disclosures is a Reg Z violation — CFPB has fined MLOs for it.

3. Equal Housing + ECOA language. Equal Housing logo or text, plus an "all loans subject to credit approval" phrase. ECOA prohibits language that discourages any protected class — avoid "perfect credit only" or "must have 2 years at same job" style phrasing.

4. Not a commitment to lend. "This is not an offer to lend or a commitment to extend credit" or equivalent. Keeps you out of UDAAP territory.

My actual post template: [Hook]. [Product benefit in 1 sentence]. [CTA]. Jon Howard NMLS #XXXXX · NEXA Mortgage LLC NMLS #1660690 · Licensed in [states]. Rates and terms subject to credit approval. Not a commitment to lend. Equal Housing Lender.

If I mention a rate: add APR and loan-term line directly after the rate. Takes 10 extra seconds and keeps you out of the regulator's inbox.

Avatar
Discard

This template is gold and I am going to recommend every LO on my team use it. Two compliance nuances to add for anyone copying it:

  • APR vs rate — if you mention an interest rate, Reg Z requires you to also disclose the APR in equal prominence. Same font size, same color, same text weight. Most compliance flags I have seen are on this one line.
  • "Equal Housing Lender" logo — FHA-related offers (HECM, 203k, standard FHA purchase) trigger an "Equal Housing Opportunity" logo requirement per 24 CFR 110. Add it to the creative, not just the footer disclaimer.
  • Trigger terms — if you say any of {down payment, monthly payment, term length, interest rate, APR}, Reg Z §1026.24 requires the full disclosure set: amount/percent of down, repayment terms, APR, any rate-change conditions. Leaving one out is the single most common state regulator finding.
  • State-specific MLO advertising rules — CO, TX, CA each have supplemental requirements beyond federal. Check your state MLO handbook at least annually.

Practical next step: Save your 4-part template as a brand kit in Canva (or whatever you use) with the logos, disclosures, and NMLS consumer-access link pre-loaded. Cuts 10 minutes off every post AND removes the "did I forget the logo" compliance risk.

Happy to run your specific numbers — call 970-457-9107 or email jon@homesteadcapitalpartners.com.

NMLS #2587985 · Licensed Colorado · For educational purposes — not a commitment to lend.

Avatar
Discard

Research project this semester — I pulled 200 MLO state enforcement actions from 2023-2024 NMLS resource center and coded the violation categories. The "APR not in equal prominence" finding is the #1 state-regulator ding for online ad content (roughly 34% of the cases I coded). The four-part template here would have prevented the large majority of them. Also interesting: "EHO logo missing or illegible" is #2 — the size matters more than compliance copy usually suggests.

Avatar
Discard

This template is getting screenshotted and saved. I lost a social post to compliance review three weeks ago for exactly the "APR equal prominence" issue — had the rate in 48pt, the APR in 14pt footer text. NEXA flagged it, I resubmitted with both at the same size, shipped same day.

One nuance I'd add on the Equal Housing piece: the logo has to be actually legible, not just technically present. I had a post with the EHO logo at 40x40 pixels in a corner and compliance asked for it at minimum 60x60 with the text underneath readable. Check what your state handbook says — Colorado specifies a minimum size in the MLO advertising rules and I'd bet other states do too.

The "not a commitment to lend" line is one I'd never have thought of as a UDAAP shield but it makes complete sense once you see it framed that way. I've been treating it as just a disclaimer but reframing it as "this protects me from a future unfair/deceptive practices finding" makes me take it more seriously.

Going to rebuild my entire Canva template library this weekend using this 4-part structure. Thanks for writing it down — most of this stuff is learned the hard way after a compliance ding.

Avatar
Discard
Related Posts Replies Views Activity
3
Apr 26
1553
3
Apr 26
1669